Lubinsky v. State

683 So. 2d 1192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13279, 1996 WL 729743
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 1996
DocketNo. 96-3224
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 683 So. 2d 1192 (Lubinsky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lubinsky v. State, 683 So. 2d 1192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13279, 1996 WL 729743 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed. See Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979); Bourjolly v. State, 623 So.2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (holding order denying Rule 3.800(b) motion to mitigate is not appealable); Alexander v. State, 553 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

PETERSON, C.J., and THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Langley v. State
721 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 So. 2d 1192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13279, 1996 WL 729743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lubinsky-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.