Lubinsky v. State

683 So. 2d 1192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13279, 1996 WL 729743
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1996·No. No. 96-3224·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed. See Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979); Bourjolly v. State, 623 So.2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (holding order denying Rule 3.800(b) motion to mitigate is not appealable); Alexander v. State, 553 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

PETERSON, C.J., and THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lubinsky v. State, 683 So. 2d 1192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13279, 1996 WL 729743 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

683 So. 2d 1192 (Lubinsky v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langley v. State
721 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)