Luben v. State

473 So. 2d 293, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14756
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 1985
DocketNo. 84-2660
StatusPublished

This text of 473 So. 2d 293 (Luben v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luben v. State, 473 So. 2d 293, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14756 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals his convictions for possession of controlled substances and possession of paraphernalia.

We find no merit in the appellant’s first point on appeal. As to the second point, we agree with the state that the appellant has not preserved the issue for appellate review. Nessmith v. State, 472 So.2d 1248 (1st DCA 1985).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nessmith v. State
472 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 So. 2d 293, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luben-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.