Luben v. State
473 So. 2d 293, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14756
Opinion
The appellant appeals his convictions for possession of controlled substances and possession of paraphernalia.
We find no merit in the appellant’s first point on appeal. As to the second point, we agree with the state that the appellant has not preserved the issue for appellate review. Nessmith v. State, 472 So.2d 1248 (1st DCA 1985).
Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Luben v. State, 473 So. 2d 293, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14756 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
473 So. 2d 293 (Luben v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nessmith v. State
472 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)