Lubell v. Work Wear Corp.
86 Misc. 1001
This text of 86 Misc. 1001 (Lubell v. Work Wear Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lubell v. Work Wear Corp., 86 Misc. 1001 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).
Opinion
Memorandum. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.
Defendant’s attorney did not demonstrate that he was a person with sufficient knowledge of the facts to respond to the interrogatories (CPLR 3134, subd [a]).
Furthermore, the court’s imposition of costs did not constitute an abuse of discretion (CPLR 8106).
Concur: Groat, P. J., Schwartzwald and O’Connor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 Misc. 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lubell-v-work-wear-corp-nyappterm-1976.