Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Lubar, LLC v. Beckerman

Lubar, LLC v. Beckerman

11 A.D.3d 434, 782 N.Y.S.2d 364, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11541
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 4, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 434 (Lubar, LLC v. Beckerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lubar, LLC v. Beckerman, 11 A.D.3d 434, 782 N.Y.S.2d 364, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Ray Beckerman and Susan Beckerman appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kelly, J), dated October 16, 2003, as denied their motion to dismiss the complaint and cancel the notice of pendency.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and cancel the notice of pendency (see Horowitz v Griggs, 2 AD3d 404 [2003]; Campbell v Smith, 309 AD2d 581 [2003]). Florio, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horowitz v. Griggs
2 A.D.3d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Campbell v. Smith
309 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 434, 782 N.Y.S.2d 364, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lubar-llc-v-beckerman-nyappdiv-2004.