Lu Shannon Sorgman v. Jason Musick & Steven Prater D/B/A Capital City Real Estate Investments

Opinion

mm VMM mm* Court of Appeals, First District 301 Fannin Street OFF^^SJSSJfesS U.S.POSTAGE» PITNEY BOWES

Court of gppeal* f trsst Mxtxitt ofMtsm NO. 01-15-00372-CV

LU SHANNON SORGMAN, Appellant

V.

JASON MUSICK AND STEVEN PRATER DBA CAPITAL CITY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, Appellees

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Travis County. (Tr. Ct. No. C-l-CV-15-002112).

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on March 31, 2015. Appellant, Lu Shannon Sorgman, did not timely file a brief. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered October 27, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown. Opinion issued October 27, 2015

In The

Court of iippeate For The

Jftr^t Bfetrtct of tEexaa

NO. 01-15-00372-CV

LU SHANNON SORGMAN, Appellant V.

JASON MUSICK & STEVEN PRATER DBA CAPITAL CITY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Travis County, Texas Trial Court Case No. C-l-CV-15-002112

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Lu Shannon Sorgman, has failed to timely file a brief. See Tex.

R. App. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of

appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b)

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for Want of prosecution for failure to timely file a

brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.