L.S.F-W. v. Department of Children and Families

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 2, 2022
Docket22-2336
StatusPublished

This text of L.S.F-W. v. Department of Children and Families (L.S.F-W. v. Department of Children and Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
L.S.F-W. v. Department of Children and Families, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D22-2336 _____________________________

L.S.F-W.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark Jr., Judge.

September 2, 2022

PER CURIAM.

In this case, we ordered Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely.

Even though Appellant filed the notice of appeal more than thirty days after rendition of the order under review, we do not dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See generally Fla. R. App. P. 9.146; see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b).

Instead, we treat Appellant’s response to the order to show cause as a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging an entitlement to a belated appeal due to ineffective assistance of counsel in a case involving a termination of parental rights. See Art. V, sec. 2, Fla. Const.; see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c); In Interest of E.H., 609 So. 2d 1289, 1290 (Fla. 1992).

Additionally, we transfer the re-designated petition to the lower court for disposition. See Art. V, sec. 2, Fla. Const.; see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(b)(1); In Interest of E.H., 609 So. 2d at 1291.

KELSEY, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

L.S.F-W., pro se, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Appellate Counsel, Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of E.H.
609 So. 2d 1289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
L.S.F-W. v. Department of Children and Families, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lsf-w-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2022.