L.R.S. v. C.A.S.

Missouri Court of Appeals

L.R.S. v. C.A.S.

550 S.W.3d 571

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in L.R.S. v. C.A.S.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 771 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 2018·No. No. ED 106260·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

C.A.S. appeals the judgment entered after remand, in which the trial court denied his request to recalculate maintenance and ordered him to pay L.R.S.'s attorney fees on appeal. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

C.A.S. appeals the judgment entered after remand, in which the trial court denied his request to recalculate maintenance and ordered him to pay L.R.S.'s attorney fees on appeal. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

L.R.S. v. C.A.S., 550 S.W.3d 571 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

550 S.W.3d 571 (L.R.S. v. C.A.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.