L.R.S. v. C.A.S.

Missouri Court of Appeals

L.R.S. v. C.A.S.

550 S.W.3d 571

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 22, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106260

StatusPublished

This text of 550 S.W.3d 571 (L.R.S. v. C.A.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L.R.S. v. C.A.S., 550 S.W.3d 571 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

C.A.S. appeals the judgment entered after remand, in which the trial court denied his request to recalculate maintenance and ordered him to pay L.R.S.'s attorney fees on appeal. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

C.A.S. appeals the judgment entered after remand, in which the trial court denied his request to recalculate maintenance and ordered him to pay L.R.S.'s attorney fees on appeal. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

550 S.W.3d 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lrs-v-cas-moctapp-2018.