LRMC v. Britt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

LRMC v. Britt

767 So. 2d 1262, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12271, 2000 WL 1369881

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 25, 2000

DocketNo. 1D99-3862

StatusPublished

This text of 767 So. 2d 1262 (LRMC v. Britt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LRMC v. Britt, 767 So. 2d 1262, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12271, 2000 WL 1369881 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWNING, J.

The order of the judge of compensation claims, in which the appellee/claimant was found to have satisfied each of the elements required for entitlement to compensation under the “occupational disease” test, is AFFIRMED. See § 440.151(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (1993); Wuesthoff Memorial Hosp. v. Hurlbert, 548 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Lake v. Irwin Yacht & Marine Corp., 398 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Broward Indust. Plating, Inc. v. Weiby, 394 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWNING, J.

The order of the judge of compensation claims, in which the appellee/claimant was found to have satisfied each of the elements required for entitlement to compensation under the “occupational disease” test, is AFFIRMED. See § 440.151(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (1993); Wuesthoff Memorial Hosp. v. Hurlbert, 548 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Lake v. Irwin Yacht & Marine Corp., 398 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Broward Indust. Plating, Inc. v. Weiby, 394 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 So. 2d 1262, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12271, 2000 WL 1369881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lrmc-v-britt-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack