L.R. v. State

557 So. 2d 121, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 780
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 1990·No. No. 88-1091·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

L.R. appeals his adjudication of delinquency for possession of cocaine. At the adjudicatory hearing the sole evidence identifying the substance was the officer’s testimony that, based on his past experience, it appeared to be rock cocaine, and that it field tested positive for cocaine. The officer described the procedure for performing the test but was unable to testify as to the reliability of the test. No laboratory report was introduced, nor was a chemist called'to testify. Based on Cabral v. State, 550 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) and Weaver v. State, 543 So.2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), the evidence was insufficient. We therefore reverse the adjudication of delinquency and remand with directions to discharge L.R.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L.R. v. State, 557 So. 2d 121, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 780 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

557 So. 2d 121 (L.R. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
179 So. 3d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Bray v. State
75 So. 3d 749 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Hampton
44 So. 3d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Johnson v. State
929 So. 2d 4 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Higgins v. State
899 So. 2d 1251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
C.E.M. v. State
870 So. 2d 858 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Smith v. State
771 So. 2d 1189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Futch v. State
744 So. 2d 540 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Sharpe v. State
589 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)