LR v. State
This text of 557 So. 2d 121 (LR v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
L.R., a Juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*122 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Burke, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
L.R. appeals his adjudication of delinquency for possession of cocaine. At the adjudicatory hearing the sole evidence identifying the substance was the officer's testimony that, based on his past experience, it appeared to be rock cocaine, and that it field tested positive for cocaine. The officer described the procedure for performing the test but was unable to testify as to the reliability of the test. No laboratory report was introduced, nor was a chemist called to testify. Based on Cabral v. State, 550 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) and Weaver v. State, 543 So.2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), the evidence was insufficient. We therefore reverse the adjudication of delinquency and remand with directions to discharge L.R.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
557 So. 2d 121, 1990 WL 11780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lr-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.