Lozier v. Preston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lozier v. Preston

257 A.D. 900, 12 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8326

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 900 (Lozier v. Preston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lozier v. Preston, 257 A.D. 900, 12 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

The highway at the place of the accident was a three-strip concrete road running generally north and south. Plaintiffs were passengers in a north-bound automobile which was passing another going in the same direction. The Prestons’ (defendants’) car was traveling southerly; it turned into the center strip to pass a ear ahead, and came in collision with the car in which plaintiffs were riding, the latter having first occupied the center strip. Plaintiff Nealon brought his action against the Prestons only. Stella Melvin brought her action and recovered against Prestons and the owner and driver of the car in which she was driven. This indicates that the jury found the drivers of both ears were [901]*901negligent. The determination is sustained by the evidence. Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The highway at the place of the accident was a three-strip concrete road running generally north and south. Plaintiffs were passengers in a north-bound automobile which was passing another going in the same direction. The Prestons’ (defendants’) car was traveling southerly; it turned into the center strip to pass a ear ahead, and came in collision with the car in which plaintiffs were riding, the latter having first occupied the center strip. Plaintiff Nealon brought his action against the Prestons only. Stella Melvin brought her action and recovered against Prestons and the owner and driver of the car in which she was driven. This indicates that the jury found the drivers of both ears were [901]*901negligent. The determination is sustained by the evidence. Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 900, 12 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lozier-v-preston-nyappdiv-1939.