Lozano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lozano v. State

622 So. 2d 639, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8910, 1993 WL 323159

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 27, 1993

DocketNo. 93-63

StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 639 (Lozano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lozano v. State, 622 So. 2d 639, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8910, 1993 WL 323159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence but strike the public defender’s fee which was imposed without notice or an opportunity to object to the amount of the fee. Upon remand, the public defender’s fee may be reinstated after notice and an opportunity to object are provided. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.720(d)(1).

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE QUASHED and REMANDED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence but strike the public defender’s fee which was imposed without notice or an opportunity to object to the amount of the fee. Upon remand, the public defender’s fee may be reinstated after notice and an opportunity to object are provided. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.720(d)(1).

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE QUASHED and REMANDED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 So. 2d 639, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8910, 1993 WL 323159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lozano-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.