Lozano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lozano v. State

622 So. 2d 639, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8910, 1993 WL 323159

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lozano v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 584 So. 2d 19 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 27, 1993·No. No. 93-63·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence but strike the public defender’s fee which was imposed without notice or an opportunity to object to the amount of the fee. Upon remand, the public defender’s fee may be reinstated after notice and an opportunity to object are provided. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.720(d)(1).

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE QUASHED and REMANDED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence but strike the public defender’s fee which was imposed without notice or an opportunity to object to the amount of the fee. Upon remand, the public defender’s fee may be reinstated after notice and an opportunity to object are provided. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.720(d)(1).

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE QUASHED and REMANDED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Lozano v. State, 622 So. 2d 639, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8910, 1993 WL 323159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

622 So. 2d 639 (Lozano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.