Lozano v. Lozano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lozano v. Lozano

827 So. 2d 362, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14296, 2002 WL 31203764

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 4, 2002

DocketNo. 1D02-3002

StatusPublished

This text of 827 So. 2d 362 (Lozano v. Lozano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lozano v. Lozano, 827 So. 2d 362, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14296, 2002 WL 31203764 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of August 1, 2002, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final. See Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Klein v. Klein, 551 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant’s “Consent Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal,” filed on September 13, 2002, is denied as moot.

ERVIN, BOOTH and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of August 1, 2002, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final. See Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Klein v. Klein, 551 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant’s “Consent Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal,” filed on September 13, 2002, is denied as moot.

ERVIN, BOOTH and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

827 So. 2d 362, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14296, 2002 WL 31203764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lozano-v-lozano-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack