Lozano, Jorge Alberto v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 16, 2002
Docket14-01-00563-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lozano, Jorge Alberto v. State (Lozano, Jorge Alberto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lozano, Jorge Alberto v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed May 16, 2002

Affirmed and Opinion filed May 16, 2002.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-01-00563-CR

JORGE ALBERTO LOZANO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 31,750

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated assault.  On November 29, 1999, the trial court placed appellant on deferred adjudication probation for three years.  On March 17, 2000, the State moved to adjudicate guilt.  On May 2, 2001, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty of the offense of aggravated assault and sentenced appellant to confinement for three years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.


Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed May 16, 2002.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Guzman.

Do not publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lozano, Jorge Alberto v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lozano-jorge-alberto-v-state-texapp-2002.