Lozada v. Warden

597 A.2d 334, 220 Conn. 907, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 440
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 19, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 597 A.2d 334 (Lozada v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lozada v. Warden, 597 A.2d 334, 220 Conn. 907, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 440 (Colo. 1991).

Opinion

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 723, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the petitioner was entitled to seek a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that his attorney in his prior habeas corpus proceeding rendered ineffective assistance of counsel?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lozada v. Warden
591 A.2d 1272 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
597 A.2d 334, 220 Conn. 907, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lozada-v-warden-conn-1991.