Loyd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Loyd v. State

399 S.W.3d 926, 2013 WL 2395977, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 682

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 2013·No. No. WD 74879·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant James Loyd appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Caldwell County following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant James Loyd appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Caldwell County following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Loyd v. State, 399 S.W.3d 926, 2013 WL 2395977, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 682 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

399 S.W.3d 926 (Loyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.