Loyd v. Northwestern Drainage Co.

157 N.W. 592, 132 Minn. 478
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 28, 1916
DocketNos. 19,814—(187)
StatusPublished

This text of 157 N.W. 592 (Loyd v. Northwestern Drainage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loyd v. Northwestern Drainage Co., 157 N.W. 592, 132 Minn. 478 (Mich. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an-appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment -and involves only the taxation of costs in favor of the defendant.

[479]*479The case was set for trial on a Tuesday. ‘On the Saturday prior the defendant, in good-faith preparation for the trial, subpoenaed his witnesses, who resided from 75 to 100 miles away. On Monday counsel for the plaintiff advised counsel for the defendant that the action would be dismissed and on the following day it was dismissed. Under the circumstances stated the defendant was entitled to tax witness’ fees. 1 Dunnell Minn. Dig. § 2218. The appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 N.W. 592, 132 Minn. 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loyd-v-northwestern-drainage-co-minn-1916.