Loyal Properties Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County

Florida Circuit Courts

Loyal Properties Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County

29 Fla. Supp. 2d 126

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedJuly 20, 1988

DocketCase No. 86-351 AP

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 126 (Loyal Properties Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loyal Properties Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 126 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record, briefs and argument,¹ we have concluded that the issues raised by Zoning Resolution No. Z-236-86 are fairly debatable upon the evidence presented, which we find to be substantial and competent. We must therefore affirm upon the authority of Dade County v. United Resources, 374 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); [127]*127Solomon v. Metropolitan Dade County, 253 So.2d 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Smith v. City of Miami Beach, 213 So.2d 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); City of Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So.2d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Housing Authority of the City of Melbourne v. Richardson, 196 So.2d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Elwyn v. City of Miami, 113 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959). See also Mayflower Property, Inc. v. Watson, 233 So.2d 390 (Fla. 1970); Marrell v. Hardy, 450 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record, briefs and argument,¹ we have concluded that the issues raised by Zoning Resolution No. Z-236-86 are fairly debatable upon the evidence presented, which we find to be substantial and competent. We must therefore affirm upon the authority of Dade County v. United Resources, 374 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); [127]*127Solomon v. Metropolitan Dade County, 253 So.2d 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Smith v. City of Miami Beach, 213 So.2d 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); City of Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So.2d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Housing Authority of the City of Melbourne v. Richardson, 196 So.2d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Elwyn v. City of Miami, 113 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959). See also Mayflower Property, Inc. v. Watson, 233 So.2d 390 (Fla. 1970); Marrell v. Hardy, 450 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Fla. Supp. 2d 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loyal-properties-corp-v-metropolitan-dade-county-flacirct-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack