Loy Ree B. Marlowe Ballam v. United States of America, and State of South Carolina

757 F.2d 86, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29988
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Loy Ree B. Marlowe Ballam v. United States of America, and State of South Carolina. Read the opinion of the Court — 747 F.2d 915
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 15, 1985·No. 83-1120·Published

Opinion

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

The appellee’s petition for rehearing of 747 F.2d 915 and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. As no member of the Court requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing in banc, and

As the panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc are denied.

Entered at the direction of Judge MURNAGHAN, with the concurrence of Judge PHILLIPS. Judge ERVIN dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loy Ree B. Marlowe Ballam v. United States of America, and State of South Carolina, 757 F.2d 86, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29988 (4th Cir. 1985).

757 F.2d 86 (Loy Ree B. Marlowe Ballam v. United States of America, and State of South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related