Loxley Epie v. Herakles Farms, LLC

• Court: Court of Chancery of Delaware
• Decided: December 12, 2024
• Docket: CA No. 2020-0999-SG
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE SAM GLASSCOCK III VICE CHANCELLOR STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947

December 12, 2024

Stephen A. Spence Jeremy D. Anderson Meluney Alleman & Spence, LLC Fish & Richardson P.C. 1143 Savannah Road, Suite 3-A 222 Delaware Avenue, 17th Floor Lewes, DE 19958 Wilmington, DE 19801

RE: Loxly Epie v. Herakles Farms, LLC, C.A. No. 2020-0999-SG

Dear Counsel:

Plaintiff in this matter seeks the nullification of the Certificate of Cancellation

of Herakles Farms, LLC (the “LLC”) and the appointment of a receiver for the LLC,

and thus, to reconstitute the juridical existence of the LLC, a dissolved Delaware

limited liability company. Plaintiff’s purpose is to domesticate and satisfy a

judgement against the LLC, based upon an award in favor of the Plaintiff and against

“Herakles Farms” from the High Court of Fako Division Holden at Buea in

Cameroon (the “Cameroon Judgment”). The principal issue before me is standing—

that is, does the Cameroon Judgment run against the LLC (such that failure to

account for it during the winding down process of the LLC amounted to a statutory

violation)? The parties have placed this before me on a paper record.

Upon review, I will require additional briefing on two issues. First, the

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, by a 2018 order domesticated the Cameroon Judgment and directed the Clerk of Court for the County

of New York to enter a money judgment against the LLC.1 Apparently, the issue of

whether the LLC was the proper party against which the Cameroon Judgment ran

(the precise issue before me now) has been litigated in the prior New York action,

and resolved in favor of Plaintiff. The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of

the State of New York, First Judicial Department, reversed and vacated the New

York trial court’s order in 2020, however, based solely on the dissolved status of the

LLC. 2 What issue preclusive effect, if any, is due to the New York trial court order?

Second, who bears the burden of showing that there exist assets to be recouped in

any successful subsequent action to enforce the Cameroon Judgment? That is, are

there assets of the LLC sufficient to justify the nullification and appointment

Plaintiff seeks, and what is the state of the record on this issue?

The parties should confer and submit a form of order setting out a schedule

for the submission of supplemental memoranda on these issues, or, alternatively,

explain why the issues are not pertinent here. Please respond by January 10, 2025.

1 Granted (Pre-Trial Stipulation and [Proposed] Order) ¶ N, Dkt. No. 79. 2 See id. ¶ P; Epie v. Herakles Farms, LLC, 129 N.Y.S.3d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 1, 2020). 2 To the extent the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO

ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III Vice Chancellor

cc: All counsel of record (by File & ServeXpress)