Lowy v. Bradley Contracting Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lowy v. Bradley Contracting Co.

139 N.Y.S. 1131

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 139 N.Y.S. 1131 (Lowy v. Bradley Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lowy v. Bradley Contracting Co., 139 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The original contract by which the beams were sold to the plaintiffs was eoneededly rescinded. There is some evidence that thereafter some of the beams were sold to them on different terms. The testimony, however, on this point is very indefinite, and is insufficient to sustain a judgment predicated on title in the plaintiff of the particular beams which _ are involved in this litigation. Judgment is therefore reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The original contract by which the beams were sold to the plaintiffs was eoneededly rescinded. There is some evidence that thereafter some of the beams were sold to them on different terms. The testimony, however, on this point is very indefinite, and is insufficient to sustain a judgment predicated on title in the plaintiff of the particular beams which _ are involved in this litigation. Judgment is therefore reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowy-v-bradley-contracting-co-nyappterm-1913.