Lowy v. Bobker

15 A.D.3d 548, 789 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1847
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust and to set aside the sale of a certain piece of real property as a fraudulent conveyance, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated October 1, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of showing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any triable issue of fact. Since the plaintiffs’ proof was insufficient, the motion for summary judgment was properly denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Florio, J.P, Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowy v. Bobker, 15 A.D.3d 548, 789 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

15 A.D.3d 548 (Lowy v. Bobker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A.G. Homes, LLC v. Gerstein
52 A.D.3d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)