Lowther v. Scheirich

241 S.W. 834, 195 Ky. 177, 1922 Ky. LEXIS 288
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 6, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 241 S.W. 834 (Lowther v. Scheirich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowther v. Scheirich, 241 S.W. 834, 195 Ky. 177, 1922 Ky. LEXIS 288 (Ky. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

Appellant Lowther commenced this áction against Scheirich, Yantis, Stilz, Yancey, Hieatt, Brown, Johnson and Wiggins, to recover $20,000.00 alleged to be due him as commission on a sale of certain oil and gas leases situated in Jackson and Estill counties, Kentucky, belonging to Duquesne iOil Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, with offices in Pittsburg. A general demurrer was sustained -to his petition as amended, and upon his declining to further plead his cause was dismissed. Complaining of this, he appeals.

In his petition he set up and relied upon two writings, one of date November 7,1918, reading as follows:

■ “Agreement.
“This agreement by and between D. C. Wiggins & C. F. Lowther said D. C. Wiggins agrees to give C. F. Lowther any amount he saves by the purchase of property of the Duquane Oil Co., at the price of $100,00.00; said D. C. Wiggins is not obligated unless he makes sale of said property. Mr. C. F. Lowther is to get option on property balance of this week today being Thursday, November 7, 1918. Said D. C. Wiggins agrees to pay $100,000.00 providing he can sell same. Mr. Lowther is to receive any amount he can save on the purchase of .the property under $100,000.00.
“D. C. Wiggins.”

[178]*178And the second one, of date November 14, 1918, reading:

“11-14-18.
“Mr. W. Y. Thraves,
City.
“Dear Sir:
“We will accept the property of the Duquesne Oil Co. at $80,000.00 payable $40,000.00 cash and the balance in 6 and 12 months with lien or leases mortgage executed upon the property to secure the deferred payments we will also agree to carry you in the new Co. to be organized at 200,000 shares without par value for 5,000 shares of stock with privilege given to you to pay for your stock at the rate of 50c per share at any time.
“Respectfully,
“H. J. Scheirich for
“C. C. Hieatt and others.”

He avers that pursuant to the said first writing he obtained an option on the said oil property from the said Duquesne Oil Company at the price of $60,000,00, but Wiggins and associates being unable to close the deal in two days time limited in the option, several additional days were given in which to effectuate the deal, but the defendants, Scheirich, &c., to whom he was about to make the sale, learning that he was buying the property at the price of $60,000.00, whereas they were paying him $80,-000.00, or a profit of $20,000.00, wrongfully refused to take the property at $80,000.00, and waited until the end of the week when appellant’s option expired and bought the property from the Duquesne Oil Company at $60,-000.00, the same price and upon the same terms at which appellant had optioned same.

The averment that appellant obtained the option, as made in the petition, must be held and construed to he a verbal option only, for there is no averment that the option was in writing. This rule is sustained by the following cases: Smith v. Theobald, 86 Ky. 141; Combs v. Cardwell, 164 Ky. 542; Smith v. Fah, 15 B. Mon. 443; Bull v. McRea, 8 B. Mon. 423; see also Newman on Pleading and Practice, sec. 555.

A verbal option or contract to buy land or an interest therein, including oil and gas leases, is unenforceable. Beckett-Iseman Oil Co. v. Backer, 165 Ky. 818.

Before appellant Lowther could enforce the contract to pay him commission he was hound to obtain from the [179]*179Duquesne Oil Company a binding and enforceable option contract for the purchase of the oil and gas property owned by it in Jackson and-Estill counties, Kentucky. As he had, according to his pleading, only a verbal contract, which was unenforceable, he had no cause of action, and the general demurrer to the petition as amended was properly sustained. The pleading was also demurrable upon other grounds not necessary here to consider.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lively v. Elkhorn Coal Co.
206 F.2d 396 (Sixth Circuit, 1953)
Henson v. Arnold
221 S.W.2d 662 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1949)
Neely v. Sheppard
196 S.E. 452 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Commonwealth v. Elkhorn Piney Coal Mining Co.
241 Ky. 245 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1931)
Commonwealth v. Elkhorn Piney Coal Mining Co.
43 S.W.2d 684 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Piney Oil Gas Company v. Allen
32 S.W.2d 335 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1930)
Kister Oil Development Corp. v. Young
27 F.2d 433 (W.D. Kentucky, 1928)
Dysart v. Dawkins Log Mill Company
300 S.W. 906 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1927)
Gray-Mellon Oil Company v. Fairchild
292 S.W. 743 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1927)
Union Gas & Oil Co. v. Wiedeman Oil Co.
277 S.W. 323 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 S.W. 834, 195 Ky. 177, 1922 Ky. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowther-v-scheirich-kyctapp-1922.