Lowry v. State

579 S.W.2d 477, 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1339
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 14, 1979
Docket56928
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 579 S.W.2d 477 (Lowry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowry v. State, 579 S.W.2d 477, 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1339 (Tex. 1979).

Opinion

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

In an unpublished per curiam opinion delivered December 7, 1977, we abated the present appeal from a conviction for aggravated rape, see V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 21.03, in order for the trial court to determine why an appellate brief had not been filed in the appellant’s behalf. See Lowry v. State, 558 S.W.2d 898 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); see also Steel v. State, 453 S.W.2d 486 (Tex.Cr.App.1970). Appellant’s brief is now before us for our consideration and the appeal has been ordered reinstated.

Appellant asserts that the court’s charge to the jury was fundamentally defective in that it instructs the jury that a verdict of guilty may be found upon a theory not alleged in the indictment. We agree and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Although the indictment alleged aggravated rape by “intentionally and knowingly by force and by threatening the imminent infliction of serious bodily injury and death,” in its charge to the jury applying the law to the facts, the court instructed the jury under all theories of culpability under Section 21.03, supra. It is now well established that such an enlargement in the charge upon the allegations in the indictment constitutes fundamental error. Clements v. State, 576 S.W.2d 390 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Todd v. State, 576 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Cullum v. State, 576 S.W.2d 87 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Jackson v. State, 576 S.W.2d 88 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); McGee v. State, 575 S.W.2d 563 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Robinson v. State, 553 S.W.2d 371 (Tex.Cr.App.1977).

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bonfanti v. State
686 S.W.2d 149 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Wilhoit v. State
638 S.W.2d 489 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Blanco v. State
647 S.W.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Viduarri v. State
626 S.W.2d 749 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Rubio v. State
607 S.W.2d 498 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
579 S.W.2d 477, 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-v-state-texcrimapp-1979.