Lowry v. State

52 Ark. 270
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 270 (Lowry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowry v. State, 52 Ark. 270 (Ark. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Public Roads: Warning to work The Legislature has prescribed the manner of warning hands to work upon the public highways. The warning may be given personally or by leaving a written notice at the usual place of abode of the person warned, in some conspicuous place.

Service cannot be had by leaving the notice with the wife of the person to be warned, because this manner of giving notice is not within the provisions of the statute. Barnett v. State, 35 Ark., 501; Bruce v. Arrington, 22 Ark., 362.

If the conversation of the overseer with the defendant is relied upon as notice it must appear to have occurred more than three days before the time fixed for the work.

There was evidence upon which a jury might find that the defendant was liable to road duty.

The instruction given by the court of its own motion as to the sufficiency of the notice was error, and for that the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington v. State
227 S.W. 28 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1921)
State v. Wainright
29 S.W. 981 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ark. 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-v-state-ark-1889.