Lowry v. State
This text of 52 Ark. 270 (Lowry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Service cannot be had by leaving the notice with the wife of the person to be warned, because this manner of giving notice is not within the provisions of the statute. Barnett v. State, 35 Ark., 501; Bruce v. Arrington, 22 Ark., 362.
If the conversation of the overseer with the defendant is relied upon as notice it must appear to have occurred more than three days before the time fixed for the work.
There was evidence upon which a jury might find that the defendant was liable to road duty.
The instruction given by the court of its own motion as to the sufficiency of the notice was error, and for that the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Ark. 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-v-state-ark-1889.