Lowry v. Phila. Optical & Watch Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Lowry v. Phila. Optical & Watch Co.

28 A. 1004, 161 Pa. 123, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 648

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 9, 1894·No. Appeal, No. 405·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,

This case involves the same question that was recently considered and decided by us in Pairpoint Manufacturing Company against same defendant, No. 419 of this term. [Reported above, page 17.] For reasons given in the opinion of our brother Fell in that case we think the decree complained of should be reversed.

Decree reversed and set aside, with costs to be paid by the appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,

This case involves the same question that was recently considered and decided by us in Pairpoint Manufacturing Company against same defendant, No. 419 of this term. [Reported above, page 17.] For reasons given in the opinion of our brother Fell in that case we think the decree complained of should be reversed.

Decree reversed and set aside, with costs to be paid by the appellees.

Lowry v. Phila. Optical & Watch Co., 28 A. 1004, 161 Pa. 123, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 648 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

28 A. 1004 (Lowry v. Phila. Optical & Watch Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related