Lowry v. Dillingham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Lowry v. Dillingham

99 S.E.2d 771, 246 N.C. 618, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 489

DecidedSeptember 18, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E.2d 771 (Lowry v. Dillingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lowry v. Dillingham, 99 S.E.2d 771, 246 N.C. 618, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 489 (N.C. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

The statute, G.S. 1-127, énumerates the cases in which a demurrer may be appropriately interposed. Rule 4(a) of the Court, 242 N.C. 766, fixes the time when a litigant may, by appeal, review a judgment overruling a demurrer. Winston-Salem v. Coach Lines, 245 N.C. 179. The rules are mandatory and when ignored an appeal will be dismissed. S. v. McNeill, 239 N.C. 679, 80 S.E. 2d 680; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126. This appeal is not permitted by the rule. The appeal is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cueiam.

The statute, G.S. 1-127, énumerates the cases in which a demurrer may be appropriately interposed. Rule 4(a) of the Court, 242 N.C. 766, fixes the time when a litigant may, by appeal, review a judgment overruling a demurrer. Winston-Salem v. Coach Lines, 245 N.C. 179. The rules are mandatory and when ignored an appeal will be dismissed. S. v. McNeill, 239 N.C. 679, 80 S.E. 2d 680; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126. This appeal is not permitted by the rule. The appeal is

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 S.E.2d 771, 246 N.C. 618, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-v-dillingham-nc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack