Lowry v. Dillingham
99 S.E.2d 771, 246 N.C. 618, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 489
Opinion
The statute, G.S. 1-127, énumerates the cases in which a demurrer may be appropriately interposed. Rule 4(a) of the Court, 242 N.C. 766, fixes the time when a litigant may, by appeal, review a judgment overruling a demurrer. Winston-Salem v. Coach Lines, 245 N.C. 179. The rules are mandatory and when ignored an appeal will be dismissed. S. v. McNeill, 239 N.C. 679, 80 S.E. 2d 680; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126. This appeal is not permitted by the rule. The appeal is
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lowry v. Dillingham, 99 S.E.2d 771, 246 N.C. 618, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 489 (N.C. 1957).
99 S.E.2d 771 (Lowry v. Dillingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McNeill
80 S.E.2d 680 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
City of Winston-Salem v. Winston-Salem City Coach Lines, Inc.
95 S.E.2d 510 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Pruitt v. . Wood
156 S.E. 126 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Pruitt v. Wood
199 N.C. 788 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)