Lowry v. De Chadenedes

141 A.D. 924, 125 N.Y.S. 1042

This text of 141 A.D. 924 (Lowry v. De Chadenedes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowry v. De Chadenedes, 141 A.D. 924, 125 N.Y.S. 1042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Per Cüriam:

The injunction appealed against cannot be sustained because .there is no competent affidavit of the facts to sustain it. The complaint is wholly on information and belief j and verified by one of the plaintiff’s attorneys: The paper purporting to be an affidavit of plaintiff is a nullity. ■ Not only is there no venue stated, but it appears to have been made out of the State, and the necessary certificate of competency of the officer taking it is not attached. (Turtle v. Turtle, 31 App. Div. 49.) It appears to have been verified before a person describing himself as “ Clerk Circuit Court.” We are not aware of any officer in the State bearing that title. The undertaking was also irregular in form-, but, if that had been the only defect,, it could have been remedied by the giving of a new undertaking. ■ The order appealed from must, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without prejudice to its renewal upon proper papers. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without prejudice to renewal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turtle v. Turtle
31 A.D. 49 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 A.D. 924, 125 N.Y.S. 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-v-de-chadenedes-nyappdiv-1910.