Lowry v. City Investment Co.

163 S.E. 208, 174 Ga. 454, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 69
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 19, 1932
DocketNo. 8331
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 163 S.E. 208 (Lowry v. City Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowry v. City Investment Co., 163 S.E. 208, 174 Ga. 454, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 69 (Ga. 1932).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

“Equity is ancillary, not antagonistic to the law; hence equity follows the law where the rule of law is applicable, and the analogy of the law where no rule is directly applicable.” Code (1910), § 4520. Any creditor has a legal right to sue a debtor when his demand is due, and the statute also gives the creditor the right to proceed by garnishment. Code (1910), § 5265. Under the foregoing principles, the allegations of the petition did not show that any of the defendants, in the prosecution of their rights, were doing or attempting to do any legal wrong against the petitioner. Accordingly, under the principles above stated, the petition failed to allege á cause of action, and was subject to general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, Q. J., and Hill, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shedden v. National Florence Crittenton Mission
12 S.E.2d 618 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 S.E. 208, 174 Ga. 454, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-v-city-investment-co-ga-1932.