Lowry v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
This text of 167 S.E. 786 (Lowry v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This being a suit to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of the plaintiff’s mule by a train of the defendant, and there being evidence of the value of the mule and also evidence which [357]*357would authorize the inference that the mule was killed by the negligent operation of the defendant’s train, the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant.
2. It does not appear from the assignment of error that the court erred in excluding certain testimony of a witness as to the distance within which a train operated as the defendant’s train was operated could be brought to a complete stop.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 S.E. 786, 46 Ga. App. 356, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-v-central-of-georgia-railway-co-gactapp-1933.