Lowry v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

167 S.E. 786, 46 Ga. App. 356, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 66
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 8, 1933
Docket22153
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 S.E. 786 (Lowry v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowry v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 167 S.E. 786, 46 Ga. App. 356, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 66 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. This being a suit to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of the plaintiff’s mule by a train of the defendant, and there being evidence of the value of the mule and also evidence which [357]*357would authorize the inference that the mule was killed by the negligent operation of the defendant’s train, the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Decided February 8, 1933. S. W. Fariss¡ for plaintiff. Rosser & Shaw, Maddox, Matthews &■ Owens, for defendant.

2. It does not appear from the assignment of error that the court erred in excluding certain testimony of a witness as to the distance within which a train operated as the defendant’s train was operated could be brought to a complete stop.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1950

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 S.E. 786, 46 Ga. App. 356, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-v-central-of-georgia-railway-co-gactapp-1933.