Lowry v. Button

1 Wright 330, 1 Ohio Ch. 330
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1833
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 330 (Lowry v. Button) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowry v. Button, 1 Wright 330, 1 Ohio Ch. 330 (Ohio 1833).

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The boy was living with the plaintiff, and xxnder his control; he was prima facie his servant. As such, he had a right to hire him out. The person contracting with the employer, and receiving the benefits, cannot call upon the person with whom he made his contract to show the right. The court erred, and the judgment must be reversed with costs and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wright 330, 1 Ohio Ch. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-v-button-ohio-1833.