Lowry Newton Klink v. United States

308 F.2d 775, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4111
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 17, 1962
Docket7053_1
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 308 F.2d 775 (Lowry Newton Klink v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowry Newton Klink v. United States, 308 F.2d 775, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4111 (10th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After waiving counsel and indictment, Appellant Klink pleaded guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312, and was sentenced to a 5-year term on December 14, 1961. The next day he was returned to Court and made an oral motion for reduction of sentence on the ground that a government agent told him he would receive leniency, if he pleaded guilty. After a hearing, the Court denied relief. Klink was aware of his right to appeal, but did not do so within the 10 days prescribed by Rule 37(a) (2), F.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.

Later Klink filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. That motion was denied on January 29, 1962. An application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis was filed on April 30, 1962 and denied. We granted the necessary permission to appeal and the government has moved to dismiss, on the ground that this Court has no jurisdiction because the appeal was filed out of time.

If the appeal is from the denial of the motion for reduction of sentence, the Criminal Rules apply. 1 And, as no notice of appeal was filed within 10 days, we have no jurisdiction. 2 If the appeal is from the denial of relief under § 2255, the Civil Rules apply 3 and we have no jurisdiction because no notice of appeal was filed within 60 days. 4

The appeal is dismissed.

1

. Rules 85 and 37(a), F.R.Crim.P.; Hixon v. United States, 10 Cir., 268 F.2d 667, 668.

2

. Wilkinson v. United States, 10 Cir., 278 F.2d 604, 605, certiorari denied, 363 U.S. 829, 80 S.Ct. 1600, 4 L.Ed.2d 1524.

3

. Rule 73, F.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C.A.; Hoover v. United States, 10 Cir., 268 F.2d 787, 788.

4

. Wagoner v. Fairview Consolidated School District No. 5, 10 Cir., 289 F.2d 480, 481; Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores, Inc., 10 Cir., 261 F.2d 406, 408.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bell
44 F. App'x 418 (Tenth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Downs
22 F. App'x 959 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Price
Tenth Circuit, 1998
United States v. Varah
Tenth Circuit, 1998
United States v. A. Leonard Varah
153 F.3d 729 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Jerry Craig Coleman
131 F.3d 152 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Coleman
Tenth Circuit, 1997
United States v. Thomas Lane Johnston
25 F.3d 1059 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Cleven Glenn Spratt
992 F.2d 1223 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Tony Ray Wicker
946 F.2d 902 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
308 F.2d 775, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowry-newton-klink-v-united-states-ca10-1962.