Lowrie v. Gourlay

71 N.W. 174, 112 Mich. 641, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 1028
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 11, 1897·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). Plaintiff has no standing in a court of law. He neglected to pay and has never tendered the amount due. The court cannot make a contract for him. Defendants have never been in default. If he desires to be relieved from the legal effect of his default in making payments, a court of equity is the proper and only forum in which he can get relief. He entered that forum, and filed a bill under which he was entitled to specific performance. This was tendered him and declined. He is therefore estopped to maintain a suit at law.

Judgment reversed, and no new trial ordered. Defendants will recover the costs of both courts.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowrie v. Gourlay, 71 N.W. 174, 112 Mich. 641, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 1028 (Mich. 1897).

71 N.W. 174 (Lowrie v. Gourlay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kreibich v. Martz
78 N.W. 124 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Satterlee v. Cronkhite
72 N.W. 616 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)