Lowrie v. Gourlay

71 N.W. 174, 112 Mich. 641, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 1028
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 11, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 N.W. 174 (Lowrie v. Gourlay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowrie v. Gourlay, 71 N.W. 174, 112 Mich. 641, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 1028 (Mich. 1897).

Opinion

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). Plaintiff has no standing in a court of law. He neglected to pay and has never tendered the amount due. The court cannot make a contract for him. Defendants have never been in default. If he desires to be relieved from the legal effect of his default in making payments, a court of equity is the proper and only forum in which he can get relief. He entered that forum, and filed a bill under which he was entitled to specific performance. This was tendered him and declined. He is therefore estopped to maintain a suit at law.

Judgment reversed, and no new trial ordered. Defendants will recover the costs of both courts.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kreibich v. Martz
78 N.W. 124 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Satterlee v. Cronkhite
72 N.W. 616 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 N.W. 174, 112 Mich. 641, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 1028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowrie-v-gourlay-mich-1897.