Lowman v. State
781 So. 2d 1148, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3355, 2001 WL 252070
This text of 781 So. 2d 1148 (Lowman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lowman v. State, 781 So. 2d 1148, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3355, 2001 WL 252070 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
We affirm all issues. In regard to appellant’s specific claim that section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1997), is unconstitutionally vague and denies equal protection of the law, we note that this court recently rejected a similar challenge [1149]*1149to the statute in State v. McClellan, 765 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. McClellan
765 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
781 So. 2d 1148, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3355, 2001 WL 252070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowman-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.