Lowman v. State

781 So. 2d 1148, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3355, 2001 WL 252070
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2001·No. No. 1D00-544·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues. In regard to appellant’s specific claim that section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1997), is unconstitutionally vague and denies equal protection of the law, we note that this court recently rejected a similar challenge [1149] to the statute in State v. McClellan, 765 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowman v. State, 781 So. 2d 1148, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3355, 2001 WL 252070 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

781 So. 2d 1148 (Lowman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McClellan
765 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)