Lowes v. Holbrook

1 H. & J. 153
General Court of Virginia·Decided September 15, 1801·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Court determined that the commission and return were admissible evidence to go to the jury to have what weight the jury might think it deserved? but that it was not conclusive evidence. That a verdict might be given in evidence, to have its weight with the jury, but it was, not conclusive. Yerdict for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowes v. Holbrook, 1 H. & J. 153 (Va. Super. Ct. 1801).

1 H. & J. 153 (Lowes v. Holbrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Honga River Gun Club, Inc. v. Montchester Gun Club, Inc.
315 A.2d 810 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1974)
Montchester Gun Club, Inc. v. Honga River Gun Club, Inc.
262 A.2d 312 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1970)