Lowes v. Holbrook
1 H. & J. 153
This text of 1 H. & J. 153 (Lowes v. Holbrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lowes v. Holbrook, 1 H. & J. 153 (Va. Super. Ct. 1801).
Opinion
The Court determined that the commission and return were admissible evidence to go to the jury to have what weight the jury might think it deserved? but that it was not conclusive evidence. That a verdict might be given in evidence, to have its weight with the jury, but it was, not conclusive. Yerdict for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Honga River Gun Club, Inc. v. Montchester Gun Club, Inc.
315 A.2d 810 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1974)
Montchester Gun Club, Inc. v. Honga River Gun Club, Inc.
262 A.2d 312 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 H. & J. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowes-v-holbrook-vagensess-1801.