Lowery v. State

437 A.2d 193, 292 Md. 2, 1981 Md. LEXIS 300
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 23, 1981·No. [No. 111, September Term, 1981.]·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Certiorari was granted to determine whether the Court of Special Appeals erred in holding that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in permitting, for purposes of impeachment, the admission of the petitioner’s prior conviction for possession of barbiturates.

For reasons stated in Ricketts v. State, 291 Md. 701, 436 A.2d 906 (1981), the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals is reversed.

Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals reversed, case remanded to that court with instructions to reverse the judgment of the Criminal Court of Baltimore and *3 remand to that court for a new trial.

Costs to be paid by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.

Chief Judge Murphy dissents for reasons set forth in the dissent in Ricketts. Judges Smith and Rodowsky would not have summarily reversed, but would have set case for argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowery v. State, 437 A.2d 193, 292 Md. 2, 1981 Md. LEXIS 300 (Md. 1981).

437 A.2d 193 (Lowery v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thurman v. State
65 A.3d 730 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2013)
State v. Westpoint
947 A.2d 519 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2008)
Brown v. State
817 A.2d 241 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2003)
Fulp v. State
745 A.2d 438 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2000)
State v. Giddens
642 A.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1994)
Morales v. State
600 A.2d 851 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1992)
Bane v. State
533 A.2d 309 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Watson v. State
510 A.2d 1094 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1986)
Cason v. State
505 A.2d 919 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1986)