Lowery v. State

58 So. 3d 307, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2517, 2011 WL 680353
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lowery v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17235
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2011·No. No. 1D10-5742·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 3, 2010, as well as the record on appeal, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature. The appellant seeks review of the lower tribunal’s September 1, 2010, Order Deeming Action One for Non-Habe-as Corpus Relief. Contrary to the appellant’s assertion, this order does not dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Rather, the order merely determines that the relief sought is not in the nature of habeas corpus relief and that it shall be treated as seeking non-habeas corpus relief. The petition apparently remains pending in the lower tribunal. This interlocutory order is not subject to review at this time. Cf. Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (dismissing without prejudice to the right to seek review of interlocutory order upon entry of a final order). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

LEWIS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowery v. State, 58 So. 3d 307, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2517, 2011 WL 680353 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

58 So. 3d 307 (Lowery v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)