Lowery v. Hudson River Day Line

249 F.2d 656
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 29, 1957·No. 24070·Published

Opinion

249 F.2d 656

Frank A. LOWERY, as owner of the barges, THE INEZ LOWERY and
THE MAE LOWERY, Libellant-Appellee,
v.
HUDSON RIVER DAY LINE, Inc., and THE PETER STUYVESANT,
Respondent-Appellant.

No. 14, Docket 24070.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 18, 1957.
Decided Nov. 29, 1957.

O'Connor & Randolph, New York City (Edward L. P. O'Connor and Anthony J. Randolph, New York City, of Counsel), for libellant-appellee.

Hill, Betts & Nash, New York City (Eli Ellis, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Before MEDINA, HINCKS and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the findings and opinion of Judge Galston, 132 F.Supp. 629.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowery v. Hudson River Day Line, 249 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1957).

249 F.2d 656 (Lowery v. Hudson River Day Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowery v. Hudson River Day Line, Inc.
132 F. Supp. 629 (E.D. New York, 1955)