Lowery v. Enbridge Energy Ltd. Partnership
876 N.W.2d 567, 499 Mich. 886
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 30, 2016·No. No. 151600; Court of Appeals No. 319199·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiff in this toxic tort case sufficiently established causation to avoid summary disposition under MCR 2.116(0(10); and (2) whether the plaintiff was required to present expert witness testimony regarding general and specific causation. See Genna v Jackson, 286 Mich App 413 (2009).
Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lowery v. Enbridge Energy Ltd. Partnership, 876 N.W.2d 567, 499 Mich. 886 (Mich. 2016).
876 N.W.2d 567 (Lowery v. Enbridge Energy Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jill Powell-Murphy v. Revitalizing Auto Communities Environmental
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2020
Chance Lowery v. Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership
Michigan Supreme Court, 2017
State v. Kenneth M. Asboth, Jr.
2017 WI 76 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)