Lowery v. Crosby

675 So. 2d 949, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13020, 1995 WL 744930
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 18, 1995
DocketNo. 94-4229
StatusPublished

This text of 675 So. 2d 949 (Lowery v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowery v. Crosby, 675 So. 2d 949, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13020, 1995 WL 744930 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary denial of appellant’s habeas corpus petition challenging his administrative confinement status and detention conditions. While the trial court properly denied the portion of the petition challenging appellant’s administrative confinement status (see Griggs v. Wainwright, 473 So.2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)), we find that the allegations relating to his treatment and conditions were sufficient to preclude summary denial of the habeas petition. Van Poyck v. Dugger, 582 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). We reverse and remand the cause for further proceedings.

MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griggs v. Wainwright
473 So. 2d 49 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Van Poyck v. Dugger
582 So. 2d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 So. 2d 949, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13020, 1995 WL 744930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowery-v-crosby-fladistctapp-1995.