Lowery v. City Liquidators, Inc.

59 P.3d 582, 185 Or. App. 403, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1964
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lowery v. City Liquidators, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 Or. App. 144
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 11, 2002·No. 9911-12211; A110995·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This case is before us following remand from the Oregon Supreme Court in light of its decision in Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 334 Or 367, 50 P3d 1163 (2002). Lowery v. City Liquidators, Inc., 334 Or 631, 54 P3d 1041 (2002). We previously had reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor on statute of limitations grounds, based on our own decision in Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 173 Or App 372, 21 P3d 1089 (2001). Lowery v. City Liquidators, Inc., 179 Or App 144, 38 P3d 951 (2002). Based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Kambury, we now conclude that the trial court properly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowery v. City Liquidators, Inc., 59 P.3d 582, 185 Or. App. 403, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1964 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

59 P.3d 582 (Lowery v. City Liquidators, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
50 P.3d 1163 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2002)
Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
21 P.3d 1089 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)
Lowery v. City Liquidators, Inc.
38 P.3d 951 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)