Lower Lafourche Planting & Mfg. Co. v. Breaux
This text of 254 F. 990 (Lower Lafourche Planting & Mfg. Co. v. Breaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant had a right to appeal, and is not to be criticized for the exercise of the right. That the amount actually in dispute may be less than attorney’s fees paid or costs incurred may evidence fidelity to right rather than litigious obstinacy. It may be that some of the amounts included in the judgment were erroneously allowed, and we might be compelled to further prolong a litigation that has had little excuse for being, but for the fact that the recovery against appellant is somewhat too small because of the exclusion of interest. The judgments are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 F. 990, 166 C.C.A. 670, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lower-lafourche-planting-mfg-co-v-breaux-ca5-1919.