Lower Coast Transp. Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.

211 F. 336, 128 C.C.A. 15, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1748
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 1914
DocketNo. 2471
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 211 F. 336 (Lower Coast Transp. Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lower Coast Transp. Co. v. Gulf Refining Co., 211 F. 336, 128 C.C.A. 15, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1748 (5th Cir. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The case shows that the Grover Cleveland was owned by the Lower Coast Transportation Company, a corporation created under the laws of Mississippi and domiciled at Bay St. Louis in that state, and that that corporation entered into a combination or partnership with the owners of the El Rito, by which the two. vessels, the Grover Cleveland and El Rito, were to be operated by a corporation known as the Lower Coast Merchants’ & Growers’ Transportation Company, the earnings to be divided between the three corporations ; and under this arrangement the Grover Cleveland was turned over to and was operated by the Lower Coast Merchants’ & Growers’ Transportation Company, which company contracted with the Gulf Refining Company of Louisiana for necessary fuel oil to operate the Grover Cleveland, and the oil furnished under this contract is the basis of the intervening libel of the Gulf Refining Company.

The District Court found that the Gulf Refining Company had alien on the Grover Cleveland for the fuel thus furnished; and in this we concur. The fact that bills were made out to other parties connected with the management of the boat does not destroy the maritime-lien for supplies furnished in a foreign port. And see chapter 373. 36 Stat. 604. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrell Ocean Services, Inc. v. United States
681 F.2d 91 (First Circuit, 1982)
The Denelfred
59 F.2d 213 (E.D. Michigan, 1932)
The Golden Gate
52 F.2d 397 (Ninth Circuit, 1931)
Knutsen v. Associated Oil Co.
52 F.2d 397 (Ninth Circuit, 1931)
The Bud III
250 F. 918 (S.D. Florida, 1918)
The John L. Lawrence
231 F. 507 (E.D. North Carolina, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 F. 336, 128 C.C.A. 15, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lower-coast-transp-co-v-gulf-refining-co-ca5-1914.