Lowenstein v. Monroe
3 N.W. 51, 52 Iowa 231
Opinion
It is not claimed the petition verified by the plaintiff was not sufficiently verified, but the point made is that, as the original petition was verified only as to the sufficiency of the causes of attachment, the defect was one which could not be cured by amendment.
We think otherwise. The defect, under section 3021 of the Code, could be well cured, and it was properly done by the verified amended petition. Murdough v. McPherrin 49 Iowa, 479.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lowenstein v. Monroe, 3 N.W. 51, 52 Iowa 231 (iowa 1879).
3 N.W. 51 (Lowenstein v. Monroe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Starkey v. Lunz
110 P. 702 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1910)
Hilbish v. Asada
125 N.W. 556 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1910)
Sannoner v. Jacobson & Co.
47 Ark. 31 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1885)
Magoon v. Gillett
6 N.W. 131 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1880)