Lowenstein v. Jaffe

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lowenstein v. Jaffe

97 N.Y.S. 1140

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 97 N.Y.S. 1140 (Lowenstein v. Jaffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lowenstein v. Jaffe, 97 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinions

SCOTT, P. J.

The verdict was clea: against the evidence and should have been i aside. There can be no doubt that the plainti were the brokers who brought the parties gether and effected the exchange. The mi that the defendant showed was that he and i associates, without legal authorization, attem; ed to bring about an exchange, and fail Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, w costs to appellants to abide the event.

GIEGERICH, J.,

concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCOTT, P. J.

The verdict was clea: against the evidence and should have been i aside. There can be no doubt that the plainti were the brokers who brought the parties gether and effected the exchange. The mi that the defendant showed was that he and i associates, without legal authorization, attem; ed to bring about an exchange, and fail Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, w costs to appellants to abide the event.

GIEGERICH, J.,

concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 N.Y.S. 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowenstein-v-jaffe-nyappterm-1906.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack