Lowenstein v. Jaffe
97 N.Y.S. 1140
Opinions
The verdict was clea: against the evidence and should have been i aside. There can be no doubt that the plainti were the brokers who brought the parties gether and effected the exchange. The mi that the defendant showed was that he and i associates, without legal authorization, attem; ed to bring about an exchange, and fail Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, w costs to appellants to abide the event.
concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lowenstein v. Jaffe, 97 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
97 N.Y.S. 1140 (Lowenstein v. Jaffe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whiteley v. Terry
83 A.D. 197 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)