Lowenstein Bros. Garment Co. v. Commissioner

13 B.T.A. 48, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3328
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided July 24, 1928·No. Docket No. 8465.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[51] OPINION.

Trammell:

We think from all the evidence that the respondent properly determined the tax liability of the petitioner on a fiscal year basis. The returns were filed upon a calendar year basis. This being true, the first issue presented must be decided adversely to the peti-iioner on the authority of Paso Robles Mercantile Co., 12 B. T. A. 750.

The question of the method used by the respondent in crediting-amounts paid by the petitioner upon a calendar year basis upon the tax liability shown due upon a fiscal year basis is also controlled by our decision in the case of Paso Robles Mercantile Co., supra, and must be decided in favor of the petitioner.

Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowenstein Bros. Garment Co. v. Commissioner, 13 B.T.A. 48, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3328 (bta 1928).

13 B.T.A. 48 (Lowenstein Bros. Garment Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowenstein Bros. Garment Co. v. Commissioner
13 B.T.A. 48 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)