Lowenfeld v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

165 A.D. 968

This text of 165 A.D. 968 (Lowenfeld v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowenfeld v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 165 A.D. 968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars as to the first four items set out in the order appealed from, except there should be stricken from items II, III and IV the words “and setting forth the date when such item was received." (Phillips v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 123 App. Div. 927.) It is not entitled to a bill of particulars of the other items. The order appealed from, therefore, is modified as indicated and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
123 A.D. 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 A.D. 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowenfeld-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-nyappdiv-1914.