Lowell v. Parkinson

2 Utah 370
Utah Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1880·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Boeeman, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court on the motion of respondents to dismiss appeal:

This is an action to foreclose two mortgages. One of the defendants, Lizzie Hyndman, demurs to the complaint, and her demurrer was sustained, and the cause dismissed as to her. Erom this order of the court the plaintiffs appeal.

The order sustaining a demurrer is not an appealable order, and the order dismissing the cause as to Lizzie Hyndman was not, as to the plaintiffs, a final judgment. The cause is still pending against the other defendants. The plaintiffs, therefore, were not entitled to an appeal.

The motion of respondents to dismiss the appeal is sustained, with costs in this court.

Sohaefeee, C. J., and Emeksow, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowell v. Parkinson, 2 Utah 370 (Utah 1880).

2 Utah 370 (Lowell v. Parkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney General of Utah v. Pomeroy
73 P.2d 1277 (Utah Supreme Court, 1937)
Shurtz v. Thorley
61 P.2d 1262 (Utah Supreme Court, 1936)
Kourbetis v. Natl. Copper Bank of Salt Lake City
264 P. 724 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Smith v. McEvoy
8 Utah 58 (Utah Supreme Court, 1892)