Lowell v. Daniels

56 Mass. 234
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1848
StatusPublished

This text of 56 Mass. 234 (Lowell v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowell v. Daniels, 56 Mass. 234 (Mass. 1848).

Opinion

Dewey, J.

Upon the case made by the plaintiff, taking the same in the most favorable light, this bill in equity cannot be sustained. If the facts are truly alleged by the plaintiff, in reference to the time of the execution of the conveyance by Rachel Smith, the plaintiff has a good legal title, and he may proceed to foreclose his mortgage by an action at law. If the plaintiff has been deceived as to the state of the title, and took his mortgage under fraudulent representations, or designed concealment of her title on the part of Smith, and by such acts as would amount to an estoppel in pais, the plaintiff may avail himself of such grounds in a court of law.

In no aspect that the case is presented, will it warrant a proceeding in the present form.

Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 Mass. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowell-v-daniels-mass-1848.