Lowell Quincy Green v. State
This text of Lowell Quincy Green v. State (Lowell Quincy Green v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-17-00304-CR
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-790-C2
and
No. 10-17-00327-CR
EX PARTE LOWELL QUINCY GREEN, Appellant From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-709-C2
No. 10-17-00328-CR
EX PARTE LOWELL QUINCY GREEN, Appellant
From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-791-C2
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In appellate cause numbers 10-17-00304-CR, 10-17-00327-CR, and 10-17-00328-CR,
Lowell Quincy Green filed two “writ of error” proceedings and another proceeding
seeking to quash the indictments and reverse his convictions in trial court cause numbers
2012-709-C2, 2012-790-C2, and 2012-791-C2. The Court of Criminal Appeals and this
Green v. State & Ex parte Green Page 2 Court have recognized that “the exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony
convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to [article] 11.07.”
Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.
ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015); Ex parte Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d 260, 261 (Tex. App.—Waco
2006, no pet.); see also Ex parte Beard, No. 10-15-00252-CR, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8522, at
*2 (Tex. App.—Waco Aug. 13, 2015, orig. proceeding). Moreover, only the Court of
Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony
cases. See Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d
481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1991); see also Ex parte Beard, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8522, at **1-2.
Because we have no jurisdiction over post-conviction habeas-corpus proceedings
in felony cases, we dismiss Green’s proceedings in appellate cause numbers 10-17-00304-
CR, 10-17-00327-CR, and 10-17-00328-CR. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07;
Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 525 n.8; Ex parte Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d at 261; see also Ex parte Beard,
2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8522, at **1-2.
AL SCOGGINS Justice
Green v. State & Ex parte Green Page 3 Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeals dismissed Opinion delivered and filed October 25, 2017 Do not publish [CRPM]
Green v. State & Ex parte Green Page 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lowell Quincy Green v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowell-quincy-green-v-state-texapp-2017.