Lowell Merritt v. James Andrews

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2015
Docket06-15-00047-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lowell Merritt v. James Andrews (Lowell Merritt v. James Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lowell Merritt v. James Andrews, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

FILED IN RECEIVED IN The Court of Appe^S The Court of Appeals Sixth District CAUSE No. 06-15-00047-CV Sixth District

SF.P 2 8 2015 SIP I 8 2015 Court of Appeals Texarkana, Texas s Texarkana, Texas Debra Autrey, Clerk Sixth Appellate District Debra K. Autrey, Clerk State Of Texas

Bl-State Justice Building 100 North State Line Avenue #20 Texarkana, Texas 75501

Lowell Merritt / Appellant v.

James Andrews and Robert Davis Appellee(s)

(MOTION FOR A RE-HEARING)

Both Parties Recorded an Invalid Document in Deed Records to Cloud Title To Mr. Merritt's Real Property Located in Waco, McLennan County.

Cause No. 2015-2602-4 ,th th Filed in the 170m District Court-Transferred to 19m District Court

Appeal From Final Order Issued By Honorable Judge Ralph Stother in the 19th DISTRICT COURT McLennan County Courthouse 501 Washington Ave., Suite 303 Waco, Texas 76701 Phone: (254) 757-5081Fax: (254) 759-5683

(Final Orders were based on an Order made void by Texas Case Law) MOTION FOR A NEW HEARING

No Court is allowed to give validity to a Vexatious Litigant Order issued by Collin County since Texas Case Law already VOIDED any and All Orders issued due to Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.

SUBJECT MATTER TOPIC

"Title to Mr. Merritt's real property located in McLennan County was Clouded by Invalid Document Recorded in the County Deed Records."

WHEN A STATUTE HAS CONFERRED EXCLUSIVE

JURISDICTION TO A COUNTY ...THIS IS CALLED SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION....Read the verbiage in this Statute.

Civ.Prac.&Rem.Code Chapter 15 Subchapter B. Mandatory Venue

Sec. 15.011 LAND. Actions for recovery of real property or an estate or interest in real property, for partition of real property, to remove encumbrances from the title to real property, for recovery of damages to real property, or to quiet title to real property shall be brought in the county in which all or a part of the property is located.

When this Lawsuit was initiated in the 74th Dist. Ct. in Waco on 04/2015 the only real property I owned in Texas was located in McLennan

County... and"shall" used in a Statute...means "No Exceptions".

TEXAS CASE LAW states....Unlike Territorial or Personal

Jurisdiction... .Subject Matter Jurisdiction can not be waived...and orders are forever void issued by a Court that Lacked Subject Matter Jurisdiction...(a Vexatious Litigant Order is not excluded) Texas Case Law also states that res judicata does not apply to courts that adjudicate a case when they Lacked Subject Matter Jurisdiction.

Mr. Jon Gimble the McLennan County Clerk, WITHOUT STANDING in this Case ...creates an order without notifying any of the parties on record, was ex-prate communications... "A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties.

This ex-parte communication swayed the Judge's Opinion BEFORE Mr. Merritt was in the Court to discuss a Motion to have the 19th District Court Judge preside over this case since it involved an "erroneous transfer of venue to a Court that lacked Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Texas Supreme Court Case Law The Texas Supreme Court has held when a court lacks authority to adjudicate a case it's Orders are void...not binding on anyone... and all acts under it are nullities... ( an act under it means any Court that gives validity to orders from courts that Texas Case Law already made void due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction... any Orders that give Validity to Orders already made Void by Texas Case Law become a nullity aka void as well since no court has no jurisdiction over orders already made void by Texas Case Law... SEE PAGE 3 OF MY BRIEF...A court must have subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate a case...Tex. Ass'n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd, 852 S.W. 2d 440, 445 (Tex. 1993) this Includes COURT OF APPEALS as well... See... Waite v. Waite, 150 S.W.3d 797, 800 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist] 2004, pet. denied) (appellate court has no jurisdictionover void judgment; appellate court can only dismiss and remand for further litigation. We must first consider were how and who caused the Collin County Court order to become Void... and it was Texas Case Law due to Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction... SEE Mandatory Venue Sec. 15.011...now we have the 19th District Court giving Validity to what was already Void By Texas Case Law due to Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction... has already been decided by the Texas Supreme Court... speaking through Folley, Commissioner, in Bridgment vs. Moore, 143 Tex. 250, 183 S.W.2d at page 707... A violation of law tried by a court the lacked authority to act as a court... causes all of it's orders to become void having no force of law...and all acts under it are considered nullities. (This means any court that gives validity to an Order that Texas Case Law made void is NOT LEGAL and is classified as a nullity aka void as well)...this is exactly what was done by the 19th District Court in Waco Texas ..via the help ofJon Gimble who has NO STANDING in the Case , the County Clerk submits an Order to give validity to voidorders... by implying a District Court's Actions prevail over Texas Case Law Rulings ...The 6th Dist COA has no authority over void orders...and can only reverse and remand. Subject Matter Jurisdiction Merritt v. Davis was erroneously transferred to Collin County...A judgment is void when the Court had no jurisdiction over the parties or property, no jurisdiction of the subject matter, no jurisdiction to enter the judgment, or no capacity to act as a court. Reiss v. Reiss,118 S.W.3d 439, 443 (Tex.2003); Toles, 113 S.W.3d at 914 may be corrected through a direct attack. Reiss, 118 S.W.3d at 443; Toles, 113 S.W.3d at 914. Civ.Prac&Rem.Code Chapter 15 Venue

Sec. 15.005. MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS. In a suit in which the

plaintiff has established proper venue against a defendant, the court also has venue of a l l the defendants in all

claims or actions arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences.

PROPER VENUE was established by Civ.Prac&Rem.Code MANDATORY VENUE...Secl5.011...Sec. 15.005 allowed me to add Mr.

Robert J. Davis since his James Andrews and Robert Davis Invalid

Document was issued the same day from the same court in the year of 2008 was considered a series of transactions or occurrences that happened the same day....This was accepted by the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco... who had a very full docket and was transferred to the Sixth District Court of Appeals via Texas Rules of Appellant Procedure Rule 17.2... and the Court Reporters Transcript acknowledges this by listing it as LOWELL MERRITT VS. JAMES ANDREWS AND ROBERT DAVIS.

I fully understand COURTS Hate pro seLitigants...I'm only asking the 6th Dist COA to rule accordingly... and take note to Texas Case Law and Statutory Laws 1 listed in my Brief ...no court is allowed imply a District Court's Orders regarding a Vexatious Litigant Order are exempt from Texas Case Law of Voiding such Orders due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction...makes the prefiling MOOT...Collin County DID NOT have Authority too act as a court....and the 19th District Court Improperly gave Validity to Collin County Orders made void by Texas Case Laws....The Supreme court upholds this by saying a court not having the authority to act as a court causes it's order to become void... and all acts under it are nullities.

The OCA does not check to see if Texas Case Law voided the

Order due to lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction...

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waite v. Waite
150 S.W.3d 797 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Board
852 S.W.2d 440 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)
Reiss v. Reiss
118 S.W.3d 439 (Texas Supreme Court, 2003)
Bridgman v. Moore
183 S.W.2d 705 (Texas Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lowell Merritt v. James Andrews, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lowell-merritt-v-james-andrews-texcrimapp-2015.